White baby (shiny veneer) with fading pink mane and
tail/gold/pink/aqua tinsel, moons, stars and planets symbol
(Tinsel variations possible)
| Pony Data | |
|---|---|
| Set | Starlight Baby Ponies, 1991 |
| Asst. Number | 4628 |
| Accessories | Aqua shooting star comb |
| Pose | Baby Blossom |
| Distribution | UK and Europe (Probably most areas) |
| Other Versions | Versions made in Hong Kong/China/No Country mark
possible. Tinsel variations also possible. None
confirmed. Also has similarities to Sparkle Baby North Star North America, 1990) |
| search engine by freefind | advanced |


It is easy to just assume the comic got it wrong, but it's
not that simple. Name mistakes in the comic are extremely
unusual. The only other major mistake came about almost
certainly because of information from Hasbro - as there is a
detailed papertrail showing the Sundae Best Ponies with the
wrong names in Hasbro's publicity. These mistakes match
those found in the comic - when Hasbro corrected them,
so did the comic. This is the only other time the
comic misnamed a pony that was currently in production.
The comic artwork is not always as accurate as the naming,
but in many cases the colour schemes or hairstyles of
particular ponies - even mistaken species - can be traced
back to Hasbro sources, whether prototype images or pictures
of the American release. All of this shows that the comic
was not just making things up - but was actually receiving
information about ponies and their appearances and names
from Hasbro directly.
That means that, almost certainly, the comic names for
Stella and Night Song came from Hasbro UK.
The fact the comic never corrected them also suggests that
Hasbro never told them that there was a name mistake, nor
made the correction themselves.
Another good piece of evidence that the name came from Hasbro is found in a storybook from 1991, which features various ponies from that year's range. One of these is the orange baby from this set, which it also calls Baby Stella
This book, "The Sparkling Show Stable Show" was published by a different UK publisher from the comic. It is very unlikely that two story-based publications randomly got the names wrong at exactly the same time. It is more evidence that the names came from Hasbro, and that Hasbro intended orange baby to be Stella - whatever happened next.
It is an unavoidable fact that surviving examples of the
orange baby Mint on Card are on cards marked 'Baby Night
Song', and those for the white baby are "Baby Stella". For a
lot of people - including both those who grew up with the
babies from new, and those who simply look at the toyline
for identification, this is case closed. But the backcards
for the two ponies do not seem to make sense in this order.
While both mention stars, Stella's is far more
star-orientated, and the orange baby has a more star-focused
symbol.
Unfortunately, the backcard stories from 1991 do not name
the ponies individually on the photo on the back. If they
did, maybe we'd have a better set of clues.
Unfortunately, I do not have the UK 1991 Hasbro store
catalogue, nor do I know where scans exist. Comparing
existing promotional photographs of this set from the
Spanish equivalent and the list of names sent to me by
Hasbro UK in 1995 is not especially conclusive, as the
Spanish catalogue has no names on the photos (and it is
possible that the store catalogue in the UK was the same).
The order in which the names appear in the list sent to me
by Hasbro UK in 1995, compared with the Starlight Baby
promotional photograph, makes it more likely that Hasbro
intended the orange baby to be Stella. But this does not
preclude the possibility that Hasbro had their own
production images that we do not know about, or that there
was a naming shift and the ponies were ultimately changed
over at a late date.
If this was a mistake, therefore, it was an industrial level one affecting not only one batch but probably the entire release.
The biggest jolt for me, however, in just assuming the comic
was wrong, is the link to Hasbro. That, coupled with the
disjointed stories compared to the ponies sealed on the card
makes me think that something, somewhere did go wrong.
Muddling this further are cases of people who had the ponies new in the 1990s but on the opposite card to what is most often found surviving today. This means that Stella and Night Song were both sold on both cards, even though the bulk of what exists now is more decisive. The fact they were sold on both cards means we cannot rule out a widespread packaging error, nor the possibility that the large number of carded ponies that survive may have done so because they were incorrect.
Normally, the name on the card would be the deciding factor in pony naming, but the disjointed stories and the conflicting promotional material from three separate sources makes me think that something, somewhere did go wrong in the packaging arena. What this something was is hard to pin down and we may never know what Hasbro was thinking when it released this set in this way. All that can be said for sure is that all the licensed Hasbro merchandise featuring the Starlight Babies seem to present the orange baby as Stella and the white one as Night Song.
In the comic, this pony was always called Baby Night Song, and
so it is her character that I am going to discuss here. In
the comic, this is the white baby.
Baby Night Song's backcard story talked about her admiring the
song of a nightingale, who sang at night to rouse the stars and
moon from their slumber. Baby Night Song wanted to sing with the
bird, in order to wake them up more quickly - but she was only
able to sing at night, and not during the day.
In the comic, she was a cautious soul, and a good foil for Baby
Mischief and Baby Explorer, both of whom were a lot more
foolhardy. In one story, she warns Baby Explorer not to be
reckless and fly her hot air balloon into danger. Even when Baby
Explorer refuses to listen, however, Baby Night Song is still
loyal to her friend and still worries for her safety.
