Orange baby (shiny veneer) with yellow mane and
tail/gold/pink/aqua tinsel, blue star with rings symbol
(Tinsel variations possible)
| Pony Data | |
|---|---|
| Set | Starlight Baby Ponies, 1991 |
| Asst. Number | 4628 |
| Accessories | Pinkish shooting star comb |
| Pose | Ember |
| Distribution | UK and Europe (Probably most areas) |
| Other Versions | Versions made in Hong Kong/China/No Country mark
possible. Tinsel variations also possible. Also has similarities to Sparkle Baby Starflower North America, 1990) |
| search engine by freefind | advanced |

It is easy to just assume the comic got it wrong, but it's
not that simple. Name mistakes in the comic are
extremely unusual. Major name mistakes generally came about
because of information from Hasbro - there is a
detailed papertrail showing the Sundae Best Ponies with the
wrong names in Hasbro's publicity. These mistakes
match those found in the comic - when Hasbro corrected
them, so did the comic. It is otherwise extremely
rare for the comic to misname a pony actively in production.
The comic artwork is not always as accurate as the naming,
but in many cases the colour schemes or hairstyles of
particular ponies - even mistaken species - can be traced
back to Hasbro sources, whether prototype images or pictures
of the American release. All of this shows that the comic
was not just making things up - but was actually receiving
information about ponies and their appearances and names
from Hasbro directly.
That means that, almost certainly, the comic names for
Stella and Night Song came from Hasbro UK.
The fact the comic never corrected them also suggests that Hasbro never told them that there was a name mistake, nor made the correction themselves.

This book, "The Sparkling Show Stable Show" was
published by a different UK publisher from the comic. It is
very unlikely that two story-based publications randomly got
the names wrong at exactly the same time.
A third piece of evidence comes from Germany, where
the advert that appeared in the German comic presented the
orange baby as Baby Sternschnuppe - which translates as
"Baby Shooting Star", while it promotes the white one as
Baby Glitzer (baby Glitter). Sternenschuppe is clearly the
German equivalent of Stella. This advertisment, like those
which appeared in the UK comic, would have come from
Hasbro's promotional department originally.
Clearly we can't just blame this on a 'comic mistake'.
It is an unavoidable fact that surviving examples of the
orange baby Mint on Card are on cards marked 'Baby Night
Song', and those for the white baby are "Baby Stella". For a
lot of people - including both those who grew up with the
babies from new, and those who simply look at the toyline
for identification, this is case closed. But when you read
the stories associated with the two ponies, and consider the
names and symbols, there's something a bit odd going on
here.
According to the backcard story, Baby Stella - whose name
means star - has a backcard story which is all about a
stellar performance, being starstruck, and a shooting
star. These all seem to tally with the baby pony with
the star on her symbol - which is the orange pony. The white
pony has planets and moons on her symbol, which makes a lot
less sense.
Unfortunately, the backcard stories from 1991 do not name
the ponies individually on the photo on the back. If they
did, maybe we'd have a better set of clues.
Unfortunately, I do not have the UK 1991 Hasbro store
catalogue, nor do I know where scans exist. Comparing
existing promotional photographs of this set from the
Spanish equivalent and the list of names sent to me by
Hasbro UK in 1995 is not especially conclusive, as the
Spanish catalogue has no names on the photos (and it is
possible that the store catalogue in the UK was the same).
The order in which the names appear in the list sent to me
by Hasbro UK in 1995, compared with the Starlight Baby
promotional photograph, makes it more likely that Hasbro
intended the orange baby to be Stella. But this does not
preclude the possibility that Hasbro had their own
production images that we do not know about, or that there
was a naming shift and the ponies were ultimately changed
over at a late date.
If this was a mistake, therefore, it was an industrial level one affecting not only one batch but probably the entire release.
Muddling this further are cases of people who had the ponies new in the 1990s but on the opposite card to what is most often found surviving today. This means that Stella and Night Song were both sold on both cards, even though the bulk of what exists now is more decisive. The fact they were sold on both cards means we cannot rule out a widespread packaging error, nor the possibility that the large number of carded ponies that survive may have done so because they were incorrect.
Normally, the name on the card would be the deciding factor in pony naming, but the disjointed stories and the conflicting promotional material from three separate sources makes me think that something, somewhere did go wrong in the packaging arena. What this something was is hard to pin down and we may never know what Hasbro was thinking when it released this set in this way. All that can be said for sure is that all the licensed Hasbro merchandise featuring the Starlight Babies seem to present the orange baby as Stella and the white one as Night Song.
In the comic, this pony was always called Baby Stella, and so
it is her character that I am going to discuss here. In the
comic, this is the orange baby.
As mentioned above, her backcard story was about a performance
in the stars, with a shooting star. It also highlighted the
meaning of her name as "Star". This concept was also carried
over into the comic, in a story where she had a chance to
perform with the Glittering
Sweetheart Sister Ponies.
